Ya-Yi Yang vs Belle Thompson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Yang vs B. Thompson
Ya-Yi Yang
TPE
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
21
Age
25
-
Height
-
680
C. Rank
847
203
Best Rank
799
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$7.3K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Belle Thompson
AUS
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
21
Age
25
-
Height
-
680
C. Rank
847
203
Best Rank
799
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$7.3K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Yang 2 - 0 Thompson
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ya-Yi Yang winning 4 and Belle Thompson winning 0. The last match between Ya-Yi Yang and Belle Thompson was at the W35 Burnie, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ya-Yi Yang getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yang | 2 |
| Thompson | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Burnie(02-18-25)
Ya-Yi Yang
7
6
Belle Thompson
5
2
(Q1) W75 Carrara(11-24-24)
Ya-Yi Yang
7
7
Belle Thompson
5
6
Y. Yang vs B. Thompson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $7,344 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.37% (136-97) | Career Total W/L | 44.14% (49-62) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Yang vs B. Thompson Match Preview:
- Recent Second Serve Performance: In their recent form spanning the last six months, Thompson has displayed an impressive prowess on their second serve, securing victory in 42.56% of points. Conversely, Yang has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 40.07%. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistical performance and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the recent form of both players in terms of their return game, Thompson has managed to seize victory in an astonishing 55.49% of their opponent's second serve points. In comparison, Yang has exhibited a marginally higher success rate, standing at 57.5%. The numbers differ when considering first serve returns, with Thompson at 43.93% and Yang at 39.42%. These figures hold a strong correlation in determining the favorite in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Examining the ability to handle pressure, Thompson has proven to be adept at saving breakpoints, successfully rescuing 54.23% of such situations in recent form. Conversely, Yang has a slightly lower success rate, having saved 43.68%. This particular statistic proves invaluable when making predictions for in-game betting.
- Performance Overview: Zooming out to evaluate their performance over the past year, Thompson has emerged victorious in 45.16% of the matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 14 wins and 17 losses. On the other hand, Yang has secured victory in 35.9% of matches, with a win-loss record of 14 wins and 25 losses. These statistics provide a comprehensive overview for making predictions in their head-to-head encounter.
- Surface Specialization: Thompson exhibits exceptional proficiency on I.hard courts, garnering a remarkable win percentage of 67% (2 wins and 1 loss). In contrast, Thompson falters on Clay courts, registering a win percentage of just 25% (1 win and 3 losses). Interestingly, Yang excels on Clay courts, boasting a win percentage of 68% (36 wins and 17 losses). Conversely, Yang struggles on Grass courts, sporting a win percentage of 40% (2 wins and 3 losses).
- Player Level: Over the past year, Thompson has predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Within this tournament echelon, Thompson has achieved victory in 36.84% of matches (7 wins and 12 losses). Similar to Thompson, Yang has primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, winning 39.39% of matches (13 wins and 20 losses). When assessing the players' statistics to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative level of the events in which they have been involved.
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Thompson and Yang have encountered each other on a solitary occasion. Unfortunately for Thompson, victory eluded them on that occasion as Yang emerged triumphant. In total, they have contested just two sets, both of which were claimed by Yang. Their most recent encounter took place at the W75 Carrara tournament on November 24, 2024 - a match that unfolded on Hard court and culminated in a resounding victory for Ya-Yi Yang with a scoreline of 7-5 7-6(3).
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: In their previous encounters, the average match duration between these players has been recorded at 1 hour, 34 minutes, and 0 seconds.
- Deciding Set H2H Prediction: Thompson and Yang have never reached a deciding set against each other. Consequently, no records of victories or losses in such scenarios exist for either player. However, this information proves invaluable when attempting to predict the outcome of a potential closely contested match.
- Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Throughout their head-to-head clashes, Thompson and Yang have engaged in a solitary tiebreak, which unfolded in Yang's favor. Thompson failed to secure victory in this intense moment, succumbing to Yang's prowess.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Examining the opponents faced by both players over the last 12 months reveals interesting insights. Thompson has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 246.29. In contrast, Yang has faced competitors with an average rank of 202.64.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: For enthusiasts of live predictions and betting, it is crucial to consider the players' performances in deciding sets. Over the past 12 months, Thompson has emerged victorious in 30% of deciding sets, while Yang has displayed greater proficiency, securing victory in 45% of all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event H2H Statistics: While past player performance constitutes a valuable resource for predicting a tennis match, it is equally essential to examine the current event statistics to gauge an in-form player's potential. If a match has already commenced within the current event, relevant statistics can be found in the section below. Additionally, some players may exhibit superior performance levels at specific events, and this factor must be taken into careful consideration when predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Thompson has impressively capitalized on 58.2% of their breakpoint opportunities, enhancing their chances of securing crucial points. Yang, though slightly less efficient, has still managed to convert 47.37% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These figures serve as valuable indicators for in-game live betting tips, particularly when a player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that provide informed predictions for tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that its content caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
Ya-Yi Yang vs Belle Thompson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Yang vs B. Thompson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 27 | Games Won | 18 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:41:27 | Average Match Time | 1:41:27 |
| 62% (79/128) | 1st Serve % | 65% (91/140) |
| 68% (54/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (51/91) |
| 39% (19/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (20/49) |
| 43% (9/21) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (6/14) |
| 49% (69/140) | Return Points Win % | 43% (55/128) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Yang 43%, Thompson 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Yang 58%, Thompson 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Yang 49%, Thompson 47%.
Y. Yang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W50 Brisbane - 10-11-2025 | ||||
R1 Sarah RokusekS. Rokusek | L | 6-0 4-6 7-6(4) | ||
Q3 Fang An LinF. An | W | 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
Q1 Sara MickoskaS. Mickoska | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| W35 Brisbane - 27-10-2025 | ||||
R1  Naho SatoN. Sato | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| W35 Brisbane - 20-10-2025 | ||||
SF  Fangran TianF. Tian | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
B. Thompson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W35 Brisbane - 27-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Elena MicicE. Micic | L | 7-5 7-5 | ||
R1 Ava BeckA. Beck | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| W35 Brisbane - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R1 Tahlia KokkinisT. Kokkinis | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| W35 Darwin - 06-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Elena MicicE. Micic | L | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 Yui ChikaraishiY. Chikaraishi | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Y. Yang vs B. Thompson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.37% (136/97) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.14% (49/62) |
| 57.85% (302/220) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.76% (111/137) |
| 53.05% (2498/2211) | Games Win/Loss | 49.65% (1136/1152) |
| 56.33% (89/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.86% (39/52) |
| 67.92% (36/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 417 | Aces Total | 87 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 670 | Total Double Faults | 305 |
| 1:29:58 | Average Match Time | 1:12:57 |
| 447.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 317.75 |
| 64% (8665/13475) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3286/5475) |
| 61% (5265/8665) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1922/3286) |
| 44% (2134/4810) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (909/2189) |
| 50% (893/1772) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (295/649) |
| 47% (6399/13531) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2340/5303) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 22.22% (2/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.69% (90/66) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (32/48) |
| 70.18% (40/17) | Futures W/L | 54.84% (17/14) |
| 59% (134/229) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (49/111) |
| 47% (20/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 19% (4/21) |
| 45% (27/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 86% (138/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (49/42) |
| 14% (138/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (49/7) |
| 17% (95/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (62/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction
J. Estevez3L. E. Ambrogi2WCW1
2.75
W2
1.39
04:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction
J. Pereira5W. Leite6W1
1.64
W2
2.11
10:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction
S. Pieri
F. Gill5W1
2.97
W2
1.34
12:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction
J. Struplova
G. Z. D. Reales2W1
2.1
W2
1.65
11:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction
R. M. Papoe
A. Chepelev3W1
1.57
W2
2.24
02:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction
M. Homberg
S. Fomin4W1
3.45
W2
1.26
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Jannik SinnerAlex De Minaur16:05
H2H 12-0
Carlos Taberner
Tomas Barrios Vera02:35
H2H 0-1
Liam BroadyJan-Lennard Struff16:00
H2H 0-1
Alex BoltDane Sweeny07:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal